Many people in the US and other Western countries believe their governments serve to promote freedom and democracy worldwide. However, this is often a false narrative—part of a deceptive conspiracy to mask less laudable priorities. theconversation.
![]() |
| When such conspiracies cease to be persuasive, they have to be refreshed. |
While official statements emphasize defending human rights, democracy, and freedom, the reality is more complicated and often contradictory:
- Military and Covert Coercion: Democratically elected leaders have been overthrown or even assassinated with Western involvement when their policies threatened Western economic or geopolitical interests:
- The 1953 US CIA coup in Iran ousted Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh after he nationalized oil, replacing him with the autocratic Shah britannica.
- The 1973 US-backed coup in Chile toppled President Salvador Allende, leading to Augusto Pinochet’s dictatorship bbcnews.
- Similar covert interventions occurred in Guatemala (1954) history.com, and the Dominican Republic, among others guardian.
- Economic Coercion: Western-dominated institutions—such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank—often impose policies that benefit Western corporations and markets at the expense of local sovereignty and democratic choice in less developed countries eurasiareview. US-led sanctions and trade pressures are also used to achieve political goals carnegie.
- Political Manipulation and Election Interference: The US and its allies have covertly funded political actors, manipulated media narratives, and interfered in elections abroad to promote governments favorable to Western interests, undermining democratic processes foreignpolicy.
- Hypocrisy in Promoting Democracy: While Western governments publicly claim to defend democracy and rights, they often support authoritarian regimes when it suits their strategic interests carnegie lowy.
These practices mean the official narrative about protecting freedom is intertwined with coercion, manipulation, and selective enforcement—a coordinated strategy that misleads citizens about the real intent of foreign policy theconversation.
Evolution of the "Rules-Based World Order"
After World War II, the US and Western powers built a system led by institutions like the World Bank, IMF, WTO, G7, and NATO. This system promised universal benefits but was structured to favor Western interests eurasiareview carnegie.
- The rules and their enforcement have been selective, protecting Western allies and constraining less powerful states lowy.
- Developing countries have often faced economic pressure that benefits Western corporations and limits their sovereignty.
- NATO and similar alliances have functioned primarily to ensure Western strategic dominance.
The Shift to Transactional Bilateral Diplomacy (Since 2025)
With President Trump’s return in 2025, US foreign policy shifted away from multilateral alliances to bilateral, transactional deals focused on short-term gain and hard leverage carnegie25 diplomacyedu.
- Traditional allies, such as Canada and Japan, heavily reliant on US markets and with less diversification, became especially vulnerable "lowest hanging fruit" to pressure and demands brookings.
- This shift increased unpredictability and forced allies to diversify relationships to reduce dependence chathamhouse.
- Authoritarian regimes face less US pushback and are increasingly assertive foreignpolicy2025.
- The US focus is now on economic nationalism and deal-making, sidelining democracy and rights.
Impact on Global Power and the Emerging Multipolar World
- The weakening of the Western-led order and US retreat from multilateralism is creating space for other powers, like China and India lowy.
- Many countries seek a more multipolar world with diversified economic and security ties carnegie.
- Old allies economically overexposed to the US are now less secure, while stronger or more diversified middle and rising powers have increased leverage nytimes2025.
Plain Language Summary
In short: The widely believed story that the US and its allies are mainly motivated by promoting freedom and democracy worldwide is largely a myth, crafted to hide real priorities of protecting markets, resources, and global power theconversation.
For decades, Western powers have undermined democracy—including with coups, covert interventions, and economic pressure—when it conflicted with their interests. The so-called rules-based order promised fairness but delivered disproportionate benefits to the West. Now, under "America First" transactional diplomacy, even long-standing allies are under economic and political pressure, while the US abandons its previous commitment to collective values.
This shift is fueling the emergence of a multipolar world—where power is spread among more nations, alliances are uncertain, and those who once called themselves defenders of democracy now often challenge those very ideals in practice.


No comments:
Post a Comment